OFCOM Channel Plans for 7.5GHz and 13GHz

OFCOM Channel Plans for 7.5GHz and 13GHz

Here is a chart showing channel plans for the UK

OFCOM - 7.5GHz & 13GHz
OFCOM – 7.5GHz & 13GHz

Uses & Applications

7.5GHz and 13GHz bands are used for Point to Point (P2P) Microwave Radio Links

Sources of Data and Graphics

All contents (C) OFCOM and taken from:

OfW48 UK Frequency Allocations for Fixed (Point-to-Point) Wireless Services and Scanning Telemetry This document shows the current bands managed by Ofcom that are available for fixed terrestrial (point to point) links and scanning telemetry in the UK.

Technical regulations

The Radio Equipment and Telecommunications Terminal Equipment Directive
99/5/EC (R&TTED) has been implemented in ‘The Radio Equipment and Telecommunications Terminal Equipment Regulations 2000, Statutory
Instrument (SI) 730. In accordance with Articles 4.1 and 7.2 of the R&TTED
the:
• IR2000: The UK Interface Requirement 2000 contains the requirements for the licensing and use of fixed (point-to-point) wireless services in the UK.
• IR2037: The UK Interface Requirement 2037 applies for scanning telemetry services.
• IR2078: The UK Interface Requirement 2078 applies for the 60 GHz band

Notes specific to the frequency charts

The first column describes each available frequency band, represented by a diagram (not to scale). The frequency band limits are listed below the diagram; frequencies below 10 GHz are represented in MHz, while those above 10 GHz are in GHz. The width of each guard band is shown above the diagram, and is always specified in MHz.
The channel arrangements in some bands are staggered, so that the width and position of the guard band vary for different channel spacings. In these cases, a table underneath gives details of the guard bands for different spacings (with all frequencies in MHz).
The first column also includes the title of the relevant international recommendations for each band, produced by the European Conference of Postal and Telecommunications (CEPT) or the International Telecommunication Union (ITU). CEPT recommendations are available at https://www.cept.org/ecc/ and ITU Recommendations at https://www.itu.int.
The final column contains the channel spacing for duplex operation in each frequency band except for bands above 60 GHz. Details of standard systems assigned in the UK are shown in the relevant technical frequency assignment criteria.

For Further Information

For More Information on Microwave Planning, Please Contact Us

OFCOM Channel Plans Upper 6GHz

OFCOM Channel Plans for Upper 6GHz (U6)

Here is a chart showing channel plans for the UK

OFCOM - Upper 6GHz
OFCOM – Upper 6GHz

The Upper 6GHz Band is defined as follows:

Standards: CEPT/ERC/REC 14-02 E
ITU-R F.384-10
Frequency Range: 6425 – 7125 MHz
Total Width of Band: 700MHz
Channel Plan FDD (Frequency Division Duplex)
Channel Widths & Spacing 20, 30, 40, 60MHz
Lower Sub-Band 6425-6760MHz (335MHz)
Upper Sub-Band 6780-7125MHz (345MHz)
T-R Spacings (Transmit to Receive) 340MHz

Uses & Applications

Upper 6GHz bands are used for Point to Point (P2P) Microwave Radio Links

Sources of Data and Graphics

All contents (C) OFCOM and taken from:

OfW48 UK Frequency Allocations for Fixed (Point-to-Point) Wireless Services and Scanning Telemetry This document shows the current bands managed by Ofcom that are available for fixed terrestrial (point to point) links and scanning telemetry in the UK.

Technical regulations

The Radio Equipment and Telecommunications Terminal Equipment Directive
99/5/EC (R&TTED) has been implemented in ‘The Radio Equipment and Telecommunications Terminal Equipment Regulations 2000, Statutory
Instrument (SI) 730. In accordance with Articles 4.1 and 7.2 of the R&TTED
the:
• IR2000: The UK Interface Requirement 2000 contains the requirements for the licensing and use of fixed (point-to-point) wireless services in the UK.
• IR2037: The UK Interface Requirement 2037 applies for scanning telemetry services.
• IR2078: The UK Interface Requirement 2078 applies for the 60 GHz band

Notes specific to the frequency charts

The first column describes each available frequency band, represented by a diagram (not to scale). The frequency band limits are listed below the diagram; frequencies below 10 GHz are represented in MHz, while those above 10 GHz are in GHz. The width of each guard band is shown above the diagram, and is always specified in MHz.
The channel arrangements in some bands are staggered, so that the width and position of the guard band vary for different channel spacings. In these cases, a table underneath gives details of the guard bands for different spacings (with all frequencies in MHz).
The first column also includes the title of the relevant international recommendations for each band, produced by the European Conference of Postal and Telecommunications (CEPT) or the International Telecommunication Union (ITU). CEPT recommendations are available at https://www.cept.org/ecc/ and ITU Recommendations at https://www.itu.int.
The final column contains the channel spacing for duplex operation in each frequency band except for bands above 60 GHz. Details of standard systems assigned in the UK are shown in the relevant technical frequency assignment criteria.

For Further Information

For More Information on Microwave Planning, Please Contact Us

OFCOM Channel Plans 4GHz and Lower 6GHz

OFCOM Channel Plans for 4GHz and Lower 6GHz (L6)

Here is a chart showing channel plans for the UK

OFCOM 4GHz & Lower 6GHz
OFCOM 4GHz & Lower 6GHz

The 4GHz Band (3600MHz to 4200MHz) is defined as follows:

Standards: CEPT/ERC/REC 12-08 E
Frequency Range: 3600 – 4200 MHz
Total Width of Band: 600MHz
Channel Plan FDD (Frequency Division Duplex)
Channel Widths & Spacing 15, 30MHz
Lower Sub-Band
Upper Sub-Band
T-R Spacings (Transmit to Receive) 320MHz

 The Lower 6GHz Band (5925MHz to 6425MHz) is defined as follows:

Standards: CEPT/ERC/REC 14-01 E
Frequency Range: 5925 – 6425 MHz
Total Width of Band: 500MHz
Channel Plan FDD (Frequency Division Duplex)
Channel Widths & Spacing 29.65, 59.3MHz
Lower Sub-Band 5925-6167.58MHz (242.58MHz)
Upper Sub-Band 6182.42-6425MHz (242.58MHz)
T-R Spacings (Transmit to Receive) 252.04MHz

Uses & Applications

4GHz and Lower 6GHz bands are used for Point to Point (P2P) Microwave Radio Links

Sources of Data and Graphics

All contents (C) OFCOM and taken from:

OfW48 UK Frequency Allocations for Fixed (Point-to-Point) Wireless Services and Scanning Telemetry This document shows the current bands managed by Ofcom that are available for fixed terrestrial (point to point) links and scanning telemetry in the UK.

Technical regulations

The Radio Equipment and Telecommunications Terminal Equipment Directive
99/5/EC (R&TTED) has been implemented in ‘The Radio Equipment and Telecommunications Terminal Equipment Regulations 2000, Statutory
Instrument (SI) 730. In accordance with Articles 4.1 and 7.2 of the R&TTED
the:
• IR2000: The UK Interface Requirement 2000 contains the requirements for the licensing and use of fixed (point-to-point) wireless services in the UK.
• IR2037: The UK Interface Requirement 2037 applies for scanning telemetry services.
• IR2078: The UK Interface Requirement 2078 applies for the 60 GHz band

Notes specific to the frequency charts

The first column describes each available frequency band, represented by a diagram (not to scale). The frequency band limits are listed below the diagram; frequencies below 10 GHz are represented in MHz, while those above 10 GHz are in GHz. The width of each guard band is shown above the diagram, and is always specified in MHz.
The channel arrangements in some bands are staggered, so that the width and position of the guard band vary for different channel spacings. In these cases, a table underneath gives details of the guard bands for different spacings (with all frequencies in MHz).
The first column also includes the title of the relevant international recommendations for each band, produced by the European Conference of Postal and Telecommunications (CEPT) or the International Telecommunication Union (ITU). CEPT recommendations are available at https://www.cept.org/ecc/ and ITU Recommendations at https://www.itu.int.
The final column contains the channel spacing for duplex operation in each frequency band except for bands above 60 GHz. Details of standard systems assigned in the UK are shown in the relevant technical frequency assignment criteria.

For Further Information

For More Information on Microwave Planning, Please Contact Us

OFCOM Channel Plans 450MHz and 1.4GHz

OFCOM Channel Plans for 450MHz and 1.4GHz

Here is a chart showing channel plans for the UK

OFCOM 450MHz & 1.4GHz
OFCOM 450MHz & 1.4GHz

Uses & Applications

450MHz and 1.4GHz bands are used for Point to Point (P2P) Microwave Radio Links

Sources of Data and Graphics

All contents (C) OFCOM and taken from:

OfW48 UK Frequency Allocations for Fixed (Point-to-Point) Wireless Services and Scanning Telemetry This document shows the current bands managed by Ofcom that are available for fixed terrestrial (point to point) links and scanning telemetry in the UK.

Technical regulations

The Radio Equipment and Telecommunications Terminal Equipment Directive
99/5/EC (R&TTED) has been implemented in ‘The Radio Equipment and Telecommunications Terminal Equipment Regulations 2000, Statutory
Instrument (SI) 730. In accordance with Articles 4.1 and 7.2 of the R&TTED
the:
• IR2000: The UK Interface Requirement 2000 contains the requirements for the licensing and use of fixed (point-to-point) wireless services in the UK.
• IR2037: The UK Interface Requirement 2037 applies for scanning telemetry services.
• IR2078: The UK Interface Requirement 2078 applies for the 60 GHz band

Notes specific to the frequency charts

The first column describes each available frequency band, represented by a diagram (not to scale). The frequency band limits are listed below the diagram; frequencies below 10 GHz are represented in MHz, while those above 10 GHz are in GHz. The width of each guard band is shown above the diagram, and is always specified in MHz.
The channel arrangements in some bands are staggered, so that the width and position of the guard band vary for different channel spacings. In these cases, a table underneath gives details of the guard bands for different spacings (with all frequencies in MHz).
The first column also includes the title of the relevant international recommendations for each band, produced by the European Conference of Postal and Telecommunications (CEPT) or the International Telecommunication Union (ITU). CEPT recommendations are available at https://www.cept.org/ecc/ and ITU Recommendations at https://www.itu.int.
The final column contains the channel spacing for duplex operation in each frequency band except for bands above 60 GHz. Details of standard systems assigned in the UK are shown in the relevant technical frequency assignment criteria.

For Further Information

For More Information on Microwave Planning, Please Contact Us

Upgrading Dragonwave Microwave Links

Why consider upgrading Dragonwave Microwave Links ?

Many users consider upgrading existing Wireless Links such as Dragonwave to add greater capacity, or network coverage.  When considering a wireless vendor, factors generally include:

  • Vendor Track Record
  • Vendor Corporate Stability
  • Product Performance & Reliability
  • Product Support and Service
  • Manufacturing Leadtimes
  • Attractive Vendor Roadmap
  • Product Pricing including all required options

Generally, Microwave links are required to operate unattended for many years in challenging outdoor environments, and therefore reliable and stable products and vendors are paramount in the selection process.

Turbulence in Wireless Vendor Market Space

Amongst many ongoing changes in the market for Microwave Backhaul and Microwave Transmission vendors, there is ongoing consolidation, M&A, and other activities.  Recently, Packet Microwave Vendor Dragonwave recently underwent receivership and buy-out by Transform-X.

According to RCR Wireless article dated 3 August 2017,

Once a significant player in the microwave backhaul space, Ottawa, Canada-based company DragonWave has effectively shutdown, with the Ontario Superior Court of Justice placing a financial receiver in charge of the firm’s “property, assets and undertakings.”

With assets sold by the Receiver to Transform-X, and the Dragonwave business is no doubt being reshaped by the new owners of the business.

CableFree FOR3 Full Outdoor 1024QAM Microwave Link - Upgrade Dragonwave
Full Outdoor 1024QAM Microwave Link from CableFree

Upgrade to Latest Microwave Technology for Higher Capacities

Some vendors are fully shipping products today with 1024QAM, XPIC, and upgrades to 2048QAM, XPIC, 10Gbps MMW (Millimeter Wave), which are features above and beyond those achieved by many in the market today.  Customers can upgrade today and achieve higher capacity, longer range, reach and availability, at low Total Cost of Ownership compared to competing options.

Future Roadmap for Microwave Upgrades

In addition to today’s products, an impressive roadmap ensures access to higher speed links and features in future products also.   Consideration is worthwhile into:

  • Vendor roadmaps to higher capacity links with microwave up to 4Gbps or more per link existing today.
  • Upgrading to E-Band MMW for shorter links especially in congested city environments
  • Using E-band Millimeter Wave for short links to free-up existing microwave spectrum, relief of spectral congestion and re-using valuable microwave spectrum for longer links where required

For More Information on Microwave Upgrades:

For more information on upgrading your Microwave Radio Network, Please Contact Us

E-Band Millimeter Wave Technology

Introduction to Millimeter Wave Technology for E-Band and V-Band

MMW Summary

CableFree MMW Millimeter Wave Link installed in UAE
CableFree MMW Millimeter Wave Link installed in UAE

Millimeter Wave (MMW) is a technology for high speed (10Gbps, 10 Gigabit per second) high capacity wireless links, ideal for urban areas. Using high frequency microwave in the E-Band (70-80GHz) and 58GHZ to 60GHz (V-Band) spectrum, links can be densely deployed in congested cities without interference, and without need for digging for cables and fibre optics, which can be costly, slow and highly disruptive.  By contrast, MMW links can be deployed in hours, and moved and reused on different sites as network requirements evolve.

History of MMW

In 2003 the North American Federal Communications Commission (FCC) opened several high frequency millimeter-wave (MMW) bands, namely in the 70, 80, and 90 gigahertz (GHz) ranges, for commercial and public use. Due to the vast amount of spectrum (roughly 13 GHz) available in these bands, millimeter-wave radios have quickly become the fastest point-to-point (pt-to-pt) radio solution on the market. Radio transmission products offering full-duplex data rates up to 1.25 Gbps, at carrier class availability levels of 99.999%, and over distances close to one mile or more are available today. Due to cost-effective pricing, MMW radios have the potential to transform business models for mobile backhaul providers and metro/enterprise “Last-Mile” access connectivity.

Regulatory Background

The opening of 13 GHz of previously unused spectrum in the 71…76 GHz, 81…86 GHz and 92…95 GHz frequency ranges, for commercial use, and high-density fixed wireless services in the United States in October 2003 is regarded as a landmark ruling by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). From a technological point of view this ruling allowed for the first time, full line speed and full-duplex gigabit-speed wireless communications over distances of one mile or more at carrier-class availability levels. At the time of opening the spectrum for commercial use, FCC Chairman Michael Powell heralded the ruling as opening a “new frontier” in commercial services and products for the American people. Since then, new markets for fibre replacement or extension, point-to-point wireless “Last-Mile” access networks, and broadband Internet access at gigabit data rates and beyond have been opened.

The significance of the 70 GHz, 80 GHz and 90 GHz allocations cannot be overstated. These three allocations, collectively referred to as E-band, comprise the largest amount of spectrum ever released by the FCC for licensed commercial use. Together, the 13 GHz of spectrum increases the amount of FCC-approved frequency bands by 20% and these bands combined represent 50 times the bandwidth of the entire cellular spectrum. With a total of 5 GHz of bandwidth available at 70 GHz and 80 GHz, respectively, and 3 GHz at 90 GHz, gigabit Ethernet and higher data rates can easily be accommodated with relatively simple radio architectures and without complex modulation schemes. With propagation characteristics being only slightly worse than those at the widely used microwave bands, and well-characterized weather characteristics allowing rain fade to be understood, link distances of several miles can confidently be realized.

The FCC ruling also laid the foundation for a novel Internet based licensing scheme. This online licensing scheme allows fast registration of a radio link and provides frequency protection at a low one time charge of a few hundred dollars. Many other countries around the globe are currently opening the MMW spectrum for public and commercial use , following the landmark ruling of the FCC. Within this paper we will try to explain the significance of the 70 GHz, 80 GHz and 90 GHz bands, and show how these new frequency allocations will potentially reshape high data rate transmission and associated business models.

Target Markets and Applications for High Capacity “Last-Mile” Access Connectivity

In the United States alone, there are roughly 750,000 commercial buildings with 20+ employees. In today’s highly Internet connected business environments the majority of these buildings need high data rate Internet connectivity. While it is certainly true that many businesses are currently satisfied with having a slower speed T1/E1 at 1.54 Mbps or 2.048 Mbps, respectively, or any other form of slower speed DSL connection, a rapidly growing number of businesses are requiring or demanding DS-3 (45 Mbps) connectivity or higher speed fibre connections. However, and here is where the problems starts, according to a very recent study by Vertical Systems Group, only 13.4% of the commercial buildings in the United Sates are connected to a fibre network. In other words, 86.6% of these building have no fibre connection, and building tenants rely on leasing slower speed wired copper circuits from the incumbent or alternative telephony providers (ILECs or CLECs). Such costs for a higher speed wired copper connection like a 45 Mbps DS-3 connection, can easily run to $3,000 a month or more.

Another interesting study conducted by Cisco in 2003 revealed that 75% of the U.S. commercial buildings that are not connected to fibre are within one mile of a fibre connection. However, despite the growing demand for high capacity transmission into these buildings, the cost associated with laying fibre does very often not allow for “closing the transmission bottleneck”. For example, the costs of laying fibre in major U.S. metropolitan cities can run up to $250,000 per mile, and in many of the largest U.S. cities there is even a moratorium on laying new fibre because of the associated massive traffic disruptions. Fibre to commercial building connectivity figures in many European Cities are far worse and some studies suggest that only about 1% of commercial buildings are connected to fibre.

Many industry analysts agree that there is a large and presently underserved market for short-haul wireless “Last Mile” access connectivity provided that the underlying technology allows for carrier-class availability levels. MMW radio systems are perfectly suited to fulfill these technical requirements. Additionally, high capacity and commercially available MMW systems have drastically come down in pricing over the last couple of years. When compared to laying just one mile of fibre in a major metropolitan U.S. or European city, the use of a gigabit Ethernet capable MMW radio can run as low as 10% of the fibre costs. This pricing structure makes the economics of gigabit connectivity attractive because the required capital layout and the resulting Return on Investment (ROI) period are drastically shortened. Consequently, many high data rate applications that could not be served economically in the past due to the high infrastructure costs of trenching fibre can now be served and are economically feasible when using MMW radio technology. Among these applications are:

  • CLEC and ILEC fibre extensions and replacements
  • Metro Ethernet backhaul and fibre ring closures
  • Wireless campus LAN extensions
  • Fibre backup and path diversity in campus networks
  • Disaster Recovery
  • High capacity SAN connectivity
  • Redundancy, portability and security for Homeland Security and Military
  • 3G cellular and/or WIFI/WiMAX backhaul in dense urban networks
  • Portable and temporary links for high-definition video or HDTV transport

Why use E-Band MMW Technology?

Of the three frequency bands opened up, the 70 GHz and 80 GHz bands have attracted most interested by equipment manufacturers. Designed to co-exist, the 71…76 GHz and 81…86 GHz allocations allow 5 GHz of full-duplex transmission bandwidth; enough to easily transmit a full-duplex gigabit Ethernet (GbE) signal even with the simplest modulation schemes. The advanced Wireless Excellence design even managed to use the lower 5 GHz band, from 71…76 GHz only, to transport a full duplex GbE signal. Later, a clear advantage is shown in using this approach when it comes to the deployment of MMW technology close to astronomical sites and in countries outside of the U.S. With direct data conversion (OOK) and low-cost diplexers, relatively simple and thus cost efficient and high reliable radio architectures can be achieved. With more spectrally efficient modulation codes, even higher full-duplex transmission at 10 Gbps (10GigE) up to 40Gbps can be reached.

The 92…95 GHz allocation is far more difficult to work with because this part of the spectrum is segmented into two unequal portions that are separated by a narrow 100 MHz exclusion band between 94.0…94.1 GHz. It can be assumed that this part of the spectrum will more likely be used for higher capacity and shorter range indoor applications. This allocation will not be discussed further in this white paper.

Under clear weather conditions, the transmission distances at 70 GHz and 80 GHz exceed many miles due to low atmospheric attenuation values. However, Figure 1 shows that even under these conditions the atmospheric attenuation varies significantly with frequency [1]. At conventional, lower microwave frequencies and up to roughly 38 GHz, atmospheric attenuation is reasonably low with attenuation values of a few tenths of a decibel per kilometre (dB/km). At around 60 GHz absorption by oxygen molecules causes a large spike in attenuation. This large increase of oxygen absorption seriously limits radio transmission distances of 60 GHz radio products. However, beyond the 60 GHz oxygen absorption peak a wider low attenuation window opens up where attenuation drops back to values around 0.5 dB/km. This window of low attenuation is commonly referred to as E-band. The E-band attenuation values are close to the attenuation experienced by common microwave radios. Above 100 GHz, atmospheric attenuation generally increases and in addition there are numerous molecular absorption bands caused by O2 and H2O absorption at higher frequencies. In summary, it is the relatively low atmospheric attenuation window between 70 GHz and 100 GHz that makes E-band frequencies attractive for high capacity wireless transmission. Figure 1 also shows how rain and fog impact attenuation in microwave, millimeter-wave and infrared optical bands that start around 200 terahertz (THz) and that are used in FSO transmission systems. At various and specific rainfall rates attenuation values change slightly, with increasing transmission frequencies. The relationship between rainfall rates and transmission distances will be examined further in the following section. Fog related attenuation can basically be neglected at millimeter-wave frequencies, increasing by several orders of magnitude between the millimeter-wave and the optical transmission band: The main reason why longer distance FSO systems stop working under foggy conditions.

MMW Attenuation Absorption Millimeter Waves E-band V-band

Transmission Distances for E-Band

As with all high-frequency radio propagation, rain attenuation typically determines the practical limits on transmission distances. Figure 2 shows that radio systems operating in the E-band frequency range can experience large attenuation given the presence of rain [2]. Fortunately, the most intense rain tends to fall in limited parts of the world; mainly the subtropical and equatorial countries. At peak times rainfall rates of more than seven inches/hour (180 mm/hour) can be observed for short periods of time. In the United States and Europe, maximum rainfall rates experienced are typically less than four inches/hour (100 mm/hr). Such a rainfall rate causes signal attenuations of 30 dB/km, and generally occurs only during short cloud bursts. These cloud bursts are rain events that appear within relatively small and localized areas and within a lower intensity, larger diameter rain cloud. Since cloud bursts are also typically associated with severe weather events that move quickly across the link, rain outages tend to be short and are only problematic on longer distance transmission links.

Millimeter Wave and Rain Attenuation V-band E-Band
Millimeter Wave and Rain Attenuation V-band E-Band

The International Telecommunications Union (ITU) and other research organizations have collected decades of rainfall data from all over the world. In general, rainfall characteristics and relationships between rainfall rate, statistical rain duration, rain drop sizes, etc. are well-understood [3] and by using this information it is possible to engineer radio links to overcome even the worst weather events or to predict the durations of weather related outages on longer distance radio links operating at specific frequencies. The ITU rain zone classification scheme shows the expected statistical rainfall rates in alphabetical order. While areas that experience the least rainfall are classified as “Region A,” the highest rainfall rates are in “Region Q.” A global ITU rain zone map and a listing of the rainfall rates in specific regions of the world is shown in Figure 3 below.

ITU Rain Zones Global Millimeter Wave E-Band V-Band
ITU Rain Zones Global Millimeter Wave E-Band V-Band

Figure 3: ITU rain zone classification of different regions around the world (top) and actual statistical rainfall rates as a function of the rain event duration

MMW Rain Fade Map for USA E-band V-band
MMW Rain Fade Map for USA E-band V-band

Figure 4 shows a more detailed map for North America and Australia. It is worthwhile to mention that roughly 80% of the Continental US territory falls into rain zone K and below. In other words, to operate at a 99.99% availability level, a radio system’s fade margin must be designed to withstand a maximum rainfall rate of 42 mm/hour. The highest rainfall rates in North America can be observed in Florida and along the Gulf Coast, and these regions are classified under rain zone N. In general, Australia experiences less rain than North America. Huge parts of this country including the more populated Southern coast line are located in rain zones E and F (<28 mm/h).

To simplify, by combining the results of Figure 2 (rainfall rate vs. attenuation) and using the ITU rainfall charts shown in Figures 3 and 4, it is possible to calculate the availability of a particular radio system operating in a certain part of the world. Theoretical calculations based on rainfall data for the United States, Europe and Australia show that 70/80 GHz radio transmission equipment can achieve GbE connectivity at a statistical availability level of 99.99…99.999% over distances close to one mile or even beyond. For a lower 99.9% availability, distances exceeding 2 miles can be routinely achieved. When configuring the network in a ring or mesh topology, effective distances double in some cases for the same availability figure due to the dense, clustering nature of heavy rain cells and the path redundancy that ring/mesh topologies provide.

MMW Rain Fade Map Australia E-Band V_Band
MMW Rain Fade Map Australia E-Band V_Band

Figure 4: ITU rain zone classification for North America and Australia

One strong benefit of MMW technology over other high capacity wireless solutions like free space optics (FSO) is that MMW frequencies are unaffected by other transmission impairments such as fog or sandstorms. Thick fog, for example, with a liquid water content of 0.1 g/m3 (about 50 m visibility) has just 0.4 dB/km attenuation at 70/80 GHz [4]. Under these conditions, an FSO system will experience a signal attenuation of more than 250 dB/km [5]. These extreme attenuation values show why FSO technology can only provide high availability figures over shorter distances. E-band radio systems are similarly unaffected by dust, sand, snow and other transmission path impairments.

Alternative High Data Rate Wireless Technologies

As alternatives to E-band wireless technology, there are a limited number of viable technologies capable of supporting high data rate connectivity. This section of the white paper provides a short overview.

Fibre-Optic Cable

Fibre-optic cable offers the widest bandwidth of any practical transmission technology, allowing very high data rates to be transmitted over long distances. Although thousands of miles of fibre are available worldwide and in particular in long haul and inter-city networks, “Last-Mile” access remains limited. Due to substantial and often prohibitively high up-front costs associated with digging trenches and laying terrestrial fibre, as well as right-of way issues, fibre access can be difficult to impossible. Long delays are also frequent, not only because of the physical process of trenching fibre, but also due to obstacles caused by environmental impacts and potential bureaucratic hurdles involved in such a project. For this reason, many cities around the world are prohibiting fibre trenching because of disruption to the inner-city traffic and the general inconvenience the trenching process causes to the public.

Microwave Radio Solutions

Fixed point-to-point microwave radios can support higher data rates such as full-duplex 100 Mbps Fast Ethernet or up to 500 Mbps per carrier in frequency ranges between 4-42 GHz. However, in the more traditional microwave bands the spectrum is limited, often congested and typical licensed spectrum channels are very narrow when compared to the E-Band spectrum.

Microwave and Millimeter Wave Spectrum V-band E-band
Microwave and Millimeter Wave MMW Spectrum V-band and E-band

Figure 5: Comparison between high data rate microwave radios and a 70/80 GHz radio solution.

In general, the frequency channels available for licensing are often no more than 56 megahertz (MHz), but typically 30 MHz or below.  In some bands, wide 112MHz channels capable of supporting 880Mbps per carrier may be available, but only in higher frequency bands suited for short distances.  Consequently, radios operating in these bands at higher data rates have to employ highly complex system architectures employing modulation schemes up to 1024 Quadrature Amplitude Modulation (QAM). Such highly complex systems result in restricted distances, and throughput is still limited to data rates to 880Mbps in the largest channels. Due to the limited amount of spectrum available in these bands, the wider antenna beamwidth patterns, and the sensitivity of high QAM modulation towards any kind of interference, denser deployment of traditional microwave solutions in urban or metropolitan areas is extremely problematic. A visual spectrum comparison between the traditional microwave bands and the 70/80 GHz approach is shown in Figure 5.

60 GHz (V-Band) Millimeter Wave Radio Solutions

Frequency allocations within the 60 GHz spectrum, and in particular allocations between 57…66 GHz, vary significantly in different regions of the world. The North American FCC has released a wider block of frequency spectrum between 57…64 GHz that provides sufficient bandwidth for full-duplex GbE operation. Other countries have not followed this particular ruling and these countries only have access to much smaller and often channelized frequency allocations within the 60 GHz spectrum band. The limited amount of available spectrum outside of the U.S. does not allow for building cost effective 60 GHz radio solutions at high data rates in European, countries such as Germany, France and England just to mention a few. However, even in the U.S., the regulated limitation in transmission power, coupled with the relatively poor propagation characteristics due to high atmospheric absorption by oxygen molecules (see Figure 1), limits typical link distances to less than half a mile. To achieve carrier-class performance of 99.99…99.999% system availability, for large parts of the continental U.S. territory, the distance is generally limited to a little more than 500 yards (500 meters). FCC has categorized the 60 GHz spectrum as a license-free spectrum. Unlike the higher frequency 70/80 GHz allocations, operation of 60 GHz radio systems does not require legal approval or coordination. On one hand the use of unlicensed technology is very popular among end-users, but at the same time there is no protection against interference, either accidental or intentional. In summary, especially in the U.S., the use of the 60 GHz spectrum can be a potentially viable alternative for short distance deployments, but the technology is no real alternative for link distances beyond 500 meters and when 99.99…99.999% system availability is required.

Free Space Optics (FSO, Optical Wireless)

Free space optic (FSO) technology uses infrared laser technology to transmit information between remote locations. The technology allows transmitting very high data rates of 1. 5 Gbps and beyond. FSO technology is generally a very secure transmission technology, is not very prone to interference due to the extremely narrow transmission beam characteristics, and is also worldwide license-free.

Unfortunately, the transmission of signals in the infrared optical bands is drastically affected by fog, where atmospheric absorption can exceed 130 dB/km [5]. In general, any kind of weather condition that impacts the visibility between two locations (e.g. sand, dust), will also impact the FSO system performance. Fog events and dust/sand storms can also be very localized and difficult to predict, and consequently, the prediction of FSO system availability is more difficult. Unlike extreme rain events, that are very short in duration, fog and dust/sandstorms can also last very long times (hours or even days rather than minutes). This can result in extremely long outages for FSO systems operating under such conditions.

From a practical point of view, and when considering availability numbers of 99.99…99.999%, all of the above can limit FSO technology to distances of only a few hundred yards (300 meters); especially in coastal or fog-prone areas, as well as in regions that experience sand/dust storms. To maintain 100% connectivity when deploying FSO systems in these kinds of environments, an alternative path technology is recommended.

The majority of industry experts agree that FSO technology can offer an interesting and potentially inexpensive alternative in wirelessly connecting remote locations over shorter distances. However, the physics of signal attenuation in the infrared spectrum will always restrict this technology to very short distances.

A short comparison of the discussed and commercially available high data rate transmission technologies and their key performance drivers is shown in Table 1.

MMW Compared with other wireless technologies
MMW Compared with other wireless technologies

Table 1: Comparison chart of commercially available high data rate wireline and wireless transmission technologies

Commercially Available Millimeter-Wave Solutions

The CableFree Millimeter-wave product portfolio includes point-to-point radio solutions operating from 100 Mbps to 10 Gbps (10 Gigabit Ethernet) speeds in the licensed 70 GHz E-band spectrum and up to 1Gbps in the unlicensed 60 GHz spectrum. The systems are available with different antenna sizes to meet the customer’s availability requirements over specific deployment distances at the most competitive price points of any E-band radio manufacturer in the industry. Wireless Excellence’s E-band radio solutions operate in the lower 5 GHz frequency band of the licensed 70/80 GHz E-band spectrum only, rather than simultaneous transmission in both the 70 GHz and the 80 GHz bands. As a result, Wireless Excellence products are not prone to potential deployment restrictions close to astronomical sites or military installations in Europe, where the military is using parts of the 80 GHz band for military communications.  The systems are easy to deploy, and due to the low voltage power feed of 48 volts direct current (Vdc), no certified electrician is required for installing the system. Photographs of the Wireless Excellence products are shown in Figure 6 below.

CableFree MMW Link Deployed in UAE
CableFree MMW Link Deployed in UAE

Figure 6: CableFree MMW radios are compact and highly integrated.  60cm antenna version shown

 

Summary and Conclusions

To solve today’s high capacity network interconnectivity requirements, highly reliable wireless solutions are available providing fibre-like performance at a fraction of the cost of laying fibre or leasing high capacity fibre connections. This is important not only from the performance/cost point of view, but also because fibre connections in “Last-Mile” access networks are still not very widespread and latest studies reveal that in the United States only 13.4% of commercial buildings with more than 20 employees are connected to fibre. These numbers are even lower in many other countries.

There are several technologies in the market that can provide gigabit connectivity to connect remote networking locations. Licensed E-band solutions in the 70/80 GHz frequency range are of particular interest because they can provide the highest carrier-class availability figures at operating distances of one mile (1.6 km) and beyond. In the United States a 2003 landmark FCC ruling has opened this spectrum for commercial use and an Internet based low cost light licensing scheme allows users to get a license for operation within a few hours. Other countries either already have and/or are currently in the process of opening the E-band spectrum for commercial use. Unlicensed 60 GHz radios and free-space optics (FSO) systems can also provide gigabit Ethernet connectivity, but at higher 99.99…99.999% carrier-class availability levels, both of these solutions are only capable of operating at reduced distances. As a simple rule of thumb and for most parts of the United States, 60 GHz solutions can provide these high availability levels only when being deployed at distances below 500 yards (500meters).

References

  1. ITU-R P.676-6, “Attenuation by Atmospheric Gases,” 2005.
  2. ITU-R P.838-3, “Specific Attenuation Model for Rain for Use in Prediction Methods,” 2005.
  3. ITU-R P.837-4, “Characteristics of Precipitation for Propagation Modeling,” 2003.
  4. ITU-R P.840-3, “Attenuation Due to Clouds and Fog,” 1999.

For More Information on E-Band Millimeter Wave

For more information on E-Band MMW, Please Contact Us

 

Microwave Links power ISP backbones in the Middle East

Implementing Microwave for High Speed Internet ISP Backbones in the Middle East

CableFree FOR3 Microwave links are being installed by ISPs in Iraq for Internet Backbone Connectivity. These links offer 880Mbps full duplex capacity with easy upgrade capability to 2+0 for 1.76Gbps full duplex, and are typically installed on towers or buildings for clear Line of Sight between network node locations.

CableFree FOR3 Microwave Installation in Middle East
CableFree FOR3 Microwave Installation in Middle East – pictures from Noor AKD

High Capacity Microwave

CableFree FOR3 can expand to 3.5Gbps and above for ultra high capacity links.  Microwave links are fast to install and can be deployed within hours, and distances up to 100km or more on suitable towers.
Microwave is low cost alternative to fibre optic and leased line connectivity and are highly reliable with uptimes of 99.999% or higher possible.
Pictures from Iraq from CableFree regional partner Noor AKD.

CableFree Products are used extensively in the Middle East region with installations in countries including Iraq, UAE, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Egypt, Lebanon, Turkey and several others

CableFree Microwave Link on a Tower in Iraq
CableFree Microwave Link on a Tower in Iraq near Baghdad

Microwave Product Data

Please visit our website for Product Data here:
https://www.cablefree.net/for3

Other CableFree products offer up to 10Gbps capacity using MMW technology.

1024QAM Microwave Links

1024QAM Microwave Links for High Capacity Wireless Transmission

High Capacity Microwave Links from leading vendors use 1024QAM modulation to achieve high capacity, spectral density and efficiency without sacrificing reliability.  This technology sets a new benchmark for microwave transmission capacity for operators including 4G / LTE Backhaul links for mobile operators as well as last-mile links, backbone and other applications.

High Capacity Links require High Order QAM modulation

CableFree Microwave 1024QAM increase from 4QAMLeading long-haul microwave equipment vendors are now using dependable long-distance transmissions using 1024 QAM. Relative to the industry-standard 256 QAM, this represents a 25% increase in capacity (and up to double the capacity of legacy SDH links), with all other factors the same. Compared to older 4QAM modulation the increase to 1024QAM is five-fold. Operators of long-haul microwave links will certainly enjoy the boost to their capacity with 1024 QAM, especially when these upgrades are relatively painless and generally require only a minor and quick swap of equipment.

Adaptive Coding and Modulation (ACM)

ACM with 1024QAM ModulationLeading microwave equipment vendors are able to keep their long-haul transmission links operational even in transient fade and noisy conditions. The enabling technology is ACM: Adaptive Coding and Modulation. Microwave links with ACM technology automatically sense the quality of the transmission link and can automatically decrease the modulation technique in case of degraded signal quality due to interference or other microwave propagation problems such as weather. So, if a microwave transmission is operating at maximum capacity using 1024QAM and suddenly encounters interference or high rainfall, a system such as the CableFree microwave system automatically steps down the modulation to lower levels until the transmission network, although at lower capacity now, maintains the ultra high level of link reliability and availability. As the temporary weather effects disappear, the microwave system automatically re-applies more efficient higher-order modulation techniques to regain full capacity.

Overcoming Tradeoffs due to High Order QAM Modulation

CableFree 1024QAM modulation tradeoffsWith increasing modulation the receiver sensitivity is greatly reduced, and generally transmit power has to be reduced due to linearity constraints in the transmitter.  For fixed modulation speeds the result is either increase of antenna size or reduced distances, which may prevent an operator upgrading to higher capacity.  The use of ACM allows use of 1024QAM whilst avoiding sacrifice of distance or antenna sizes, by graceful step-down of modulation to lower rates during rare periods of high rainfall.

Use along with other bandwidth-enhancing technologies such as XPIC

1024QAM modulation is fully compatible with other methods to increase capacity such as XPIC (Cross Polar Interference Cancellation).  An advanced microwave modem featuring 1024QAM and XPIC can greatly increase capacity.  XPIC alone offers double the capacity compared to a single polarised non-XPIC solution.

1024QAM Microwave Summary

These latest advancements in advanced microwave modulation offer network operators an easy and inexpensive upgrade path to higher capacities to meet demand. Advanced modulation technology of 1024QAM is fully shipping and available today and offers a very cost-effective way to boost capacity in long-haul microwave applications.

For Further Information

For More Information on High Capacity Microwave Solutions, Please Contact Us

 

ACM: Adaptive Coding and Modulation

Automatic Coding and Modulation (ACM)

Microwave Adaptive Coding and Modulation (ACM)
Microwave Adaptive Coding and Modulation (ACM)

Adaptive Coding and Modulation or Link adaptation is a term used in wireless communications to denote the matching of the modulation, coding and other signal and protocol parameters to the conditions on the radio link (e.g. the pathloss, the interference due to signals coming from other transmitters, the sensitivity of the receiver, the available transmitter power margin, etc.). In a digital Microwave Link ACM uses a rate adaptation algorithm that adapts the modulation and coding scheme (MCS) according to the quality of the radio channel, and thus the bit rate and robustness of data transmission. The process of link adaptation is a dynamic one and the signal and protocol parameters change as the radio link conditions change.

The Goal of ACM

ACM with 1024 QAM Modulation
ACM with 1024 QAM Modulation

The goal of Adaptive Modulation and Coding  is to improve the operational efficiency of Microwave links by increasing network capacity over the existing infrastructure – while reducing sensitivity to environmental interferences.
Adaptive Modulation means dynamically varying the modulation in an errorless manner in order to maximize the throughput under momentary propagation conditions. In other words, a system can operate at its maximum throughput under clear sky conditions, and decrease it
gradually under rain fade.  For example a link can change from 1024QAM down to QPSK to keep “link alive” without losing connection.  Prior to the development of Automatic Coding and Modulation, microwave designers had to design for “worst case” conditions to avoid link outage The benefits of using ACM include:

  • Longer link lengths (distance)
  • Using smaller antennas (saves on mast space, also often required in residential areas)
  • Higher Availability (link reliability)

Importance to Operators of ACM

CableFree Microwave Link using 30cm antenna benefits from ACM giving longer reach and higher availability
CableFree Microwave Link using 30cm antenna benefits from ACM giving longer reach and higher availability

Adaptive Coding and Modulation increases the capacity of microwave links without sacrificing distance or availability, and without requiring larger antennas.  The penalty – reduced capacity during heavy fade/rainfall – is usually considered an acceptable trade-off compared to the benefits, especially for IP networks where a variable capacity is generally considered acceptable, compared to legacy PDH (NxE1/T1) and SDH connections which are fixed capacity applications.  Conversely, ACM allows operators to minimise costs by using smaller antennas, meet higher availability targets (e.g. 99.999% availability) and customer SLA (service level agreement) and also fit within aesthetic and planning constraints in dense urban areas and regions of natural beauty where large antennas may be prohibited by planners or building owners.

For Further Information on ACM and Microwave Links

For more information on Microwave Links with ACM please Contact Us

Microwave Antenna Alignment

Alignment of Microwave Antennas for Digital Microwave Transmission Systems

This article contains generic instructions for alignment of Microwave antennas.  Specific products may have different features, in which case please refer to the documentation provided for those products:

CableFree Microwave Antenna Alignment
CableFree Microwave Antenna Alignment

Antenna Alignment for Microwave Links

This guide explains how to achieve the optimal antenna alignment of microwave antennas when used with modern digital microwave products.  Before attempting to do the alignment it is highly recommended that you read this guide in detail.  For specific commands please consult the manual of the product being installed

Step 1:  Preparation:

Mount the antenna on the tower according to the antenna installation instructions:  Ensure that the adjustment bolts move smoothly and the range of motion is sufficient for the expected angle of up and down (elevation) tilt. Ensure that the mount itself is attached securely and all safety precautions have been taken.

CableFree Microwave Antenna Alignment using DVM
CableFree Microwave Antenna Alignment using DVM

Step 2: Coarse Alignment:

Visually align the antenna with the far end.  The most common ways to do this are :

1)      If the visibility is good and the sun is in the correct position, have someone at the far end location reflect the sun with a mirror so the location is obvious.

2)      If visibility is poor, use GPS coordinates and a GPS compass to aim the antenna coarsely.

CableFree Microwave Antenna Alignment avoiding Sidelobes
CableFree Microwave Antenna Alignment avoiding Sidelobes

Step 3: Fine Alignment.

Before conducting fine alignment, the ODUs at both ends of the link must be attached properly to the antenna via the direct mount or remote mount (using Waveguide) and the far end ODU must be powered on and transmitting.  The ODU lightning surge suppressors and grounding provisions should be put in place as well before alignment. The local ODU must be powered on, but need not be transmitting.

Ensure that:

1)      Frequency of the far end transmitter matches the frequency of the local receiver.

2)      The TX output power is not set above the level of the license.

3)      ATPC is turned OFF on the far end.

4)      Alignment mode is ON for SP ODUs – Display on ODU and IDU will update at 5 times per second.

FINE ALIGNMENT PROCEDURE

1)      Adjust the azimuth over a 30 degree sweep by turning the adjustment bolt in increments of 1/10th turn to avoid missing the main lobe. When the highest signal has been found for azimuth, repeat for the elevation adjustment.

2)      Turn the local transmitter on to allow alignment at the far end.

3)      Move to the far end of the link and repeat step 1.

4)      Lock down the antenna so no further movement can occur.

5)      Install the antenna side struts supplied with the antenna.

6)      Verify the RSSI remains the same and is within 2-4 dB of the expected levels.

7)      Check the ODU connector seals.

8)      Turn alignment mode OFF

9)      The alignment is complete.